Why Scientists and Physicians See Health Differently – And Why That Matters for Inflammation Testing

What I’ve Learned from Listening to Scientists:

It’s important to begin with a distinction that often goes unrecognized: a scientist's work is not the same as a physician's. Scientists do not give medical advice. That’s not their role — and that’s by design. Physicians, especially in primary care, focus on implementing current best practices, clinical guidelines, and time-tested medical protocols. Scientific research, on the other hand, is often operating ahead of those protocols, exploring emerging knowledge that may eventually shape future standards of care.

Scientists prefer to investigate what’s new, important, and potentially transformative. The aim is to push boundaries — not to revisit what’s already well understood. So when scientific findings are shared, they often don’t align 100% with current medical practice. That’s not a flaw — that’s the point. The research perspective is meant to ask different questions and open up possibilities that clinical practice will eventually test and validate.

The Role of Blood Tests in Scientific Research

In research laboratories, especially in clinical studies focused on inflammation and chronic illness, extensive blood testing is standard practice. This is because blood markers provide invaluable insights into internal processes — sometimes long before those processes result in obvious symptoms.

Across many studies, researchers consistently find that around 35% of participants show signs of previously undiagnosed medical issues during routine baseline blood testing. These include cases of diabetes, thyroid dysfunction, anemia, autoimmune diseases, and more — often discovered only because the study ran tests that aren’t typically part of standard medical checkups.

This underscores the value of scientific research in filling gaps in early detection and building understanding that may one day shift the boundaries of what medicine considers “routine.”

Chronic Inflammation: A Key Focus of Research

A major area of interest in contemporary health research is chronic inflammation — the kind that persists for months or years, in contrast to acute inflammation, which is a natural part of healing after injury or infection.

While acute inflammation is protective, sustained inflammation is damaging. It can gradually degrade tissues, damage organs, and contribute to the progression of various diseases. Chronic inflammation has been increasingly implicated in conditions such as:

Fibromyalgia
Myalgic encephalomyelitis / Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Long COVID
Gulf War Illness
Cardiovascular disease
Neuroinflammatory and autoimmune disorders

Systemic inflammation can also spread between organs — for example, from the gut to the brain, or from the gums to the heart. And yet, tests for systemic inflammation are rarely included in standard annual physicals, despite their potential to reveal early disease processes.

The Two Most Informative Inflammation Tests

When researchers aim to identify or monitor systemic inflammation, two blood tests are typically considered the most essential:

1. High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP)

Function: An early and sensitive marker of systemic inflammation
Unit: milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Healthy range: Below 1.0
Risk scale:
- 1–3 mg/L: mild elevation
- 4–9 mg/L: high risk
- 10+ mg/L: clinically significant inflammation that requires investigation

This marker is especially valuable because of its rapid responsiveness to changes in the body. Research has shown that CRP levels can correlate with fluctuations in symptom severity — even on a day-to-day basis. Following the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers also noticed unusually high CRP levels in otherwise healthy individuals, raising questions about post-viral inflammatory responses.

2. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)

Function: A broader, more stable indicator of inflammation
Unit: millimeters per hour (mm/hr)
Healthy range: Below 20 mm/hr
Risk scale:
- 20–40 mm/hr: mild elevation
- 60 mm/hr: moderate inflammation
- 100+ mm/hr: serious inflammation requiring further diagnostic work

ESR is less sensitive to daily fluctuations compared to CRP, making it useful for tracking longer-term trends. Together, CRP and ESR offer complementary insights into both acute and chronic inflammatory states.

If only two tests can be run, these are the ones most strongly recommended based on current research.

Additional Tests That Complete the Picture

For individuals or providers seeking a more comprehensive assessment of systemic inflammation, six additional markers are often included in research protocols:

Serum Amyloid A (SAA)
Plasma Viscosity
Ferritin (also an acute-phase reactant)
Fibrinogen
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α)

When combined with CRP and ESR, these eight markers provide a multifaceted profile of the body's inflammatory state. If all eight tests return low or normal values, it is generally a strong indicator that systemic inflammation is not a current issue.

Why Physicians Don’t Routinely Run These Tests

It’s important to understand the different priorities and constraints of clinical care.

A Primary Care Provider (PCP) makes decisions based on:

A physical examination
A review of medical and family history
The patient's reported symptoms
Clinical guidelines and cost-effectiveness

But there are potential blind spots:

Patients may not report symptoms they’ve lived with for years, assuming they’re normal
Family medical history may be unknown or incomplete
Time and resource limitations prevent routine use of broad diagnostic panels

Physicians must rely on published peer-reviewed science to guide their decision-making. As new findings emerge, it is essential that clinical knowledge is regularly updated, and that physicians refer patients to specialists or order further testing based on their professional judgment.

This is precisely where scientific research plays a critical role — by identifying new patterns, proposing new thresholds, and helping define what borderline high or low values might mean in the context of underlying disease processes.

What to Do If These Tests Aren’t Offered

If a PCP is unable or unwilling to order these tests, there are direct-to-consumer options available:

Walk-in lab services – Most large national labs allow patients to order their own blood work online, without needing a doctor’s referral. The ordering process typically includes review by a lab-affiliated physician.
At-home test kits – Some companies offer kits that can be mailed to your home. You collect a blood sample yourself, return it by mail, and receive results online. Not all eight tests are available this way, but CRP and some others often are.

These services are more expensive, but they offer greater access. For example:

Running only CRP and ESR might cost under $100
Running all eight inflammation tests could total several hundred dollars

What Elevated Markers Mean – And What Comes Next

It’s crucial to remember: all of these inflammation markers are non-specific. They can confirm that something is going on in the body, but they do not pinpoint what.

If any result comes back elevated, the next step is to work with a medical provider who can:

Order follow-up diagnostics
Evaluate symptoms in context
Possibly refer to a rheumatologist, immunologist, or other specialist

This is where the partnership between science and medicine becomes essential.

A Final Note: Why Early Detection Matters

From a scientific standpoint, more data is generally better — especially when it comes to tracking inflammation over time. Even low-level inflammation, if persistent, may signal risk for disease years before symptoms appear. Identifying and addressing this early could be critical for long-term health.

That’s why many researchers support the idea of running these inflammation tests regularly, even in people who feel healthy. The cost is low, the risk is minimal, and the information can be life-changing.

One Last Clarification

Inflammation markers are not the same as markers for overall immune system activity. For that, the standard test is the Complete Blood Count with Differential (CBCD). While that test is common in annual checkups and can also indicate inflammation, it is more complex to interpret and reflects different aspects of immune function.

In Summary

Scientists and physicians work from different perspectives, and both are essential.
Blood-based inflammation markers can uncover early warning signs that standard care may miss.
CRP and ESR are the two most essential tests, and six others can provide a deeper view.
These tests are accessible, even outside the traditional medical system.
Any elevated result should lead to medical follow-up to determine the underlying cause.

Scientific research helps define what we should be looking for, even before clinical guidelines catch up. As the science evolves, so too will the standards of care.

The earlier we understand inflammation, the better we can prevent the damage it causes.

Search This Blog

Q and A: about health and research